Guess who set up a tumblr.?! This girl. Check it out at kasstaylorphotography.tumblr.com.
I'm hoping that it will be a good outlet for my photography.. Let's hope (:
Call Me Kass
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
~A Real Eye Opener~
For my English Composition class this semester, I had to do an argumentative research paper for my final paper. I wanted to do my paper on some aspect of the foster care system. My family became a licensed foster home on March 22, 2013, and we got our first placement on June 21, 2013.
Even though these two boys - ages four and two - are our first placement, our eyes have been opened so much. For me, personally, I just can't believe some of the things that these boys, at such a young age, have had to go through.
I decided to do my argumentative research paper on biological parent accountability. I got an A on the paper, so I guess it has some good points.
Even though these two boys - ages four and two - are our first placement, our eyes have been opened so much. For me, personally, I just can't believe some of the things that these boys, at such a young age, have had to go through.
I decided to do my argumentative research paper on biological parent accountability. I got an A on the paper, so I guess it has some good points.
Biological
Parent Accountability
The foster care system is flawed. What do I mean by that? Well, first let’s get some basic
definitions. According to
Mirriam-Webster.com, “foster care” is defined as “supervised care for orphaned,
neglected, or delinquent children…”
Mirriam-Webster.com also states that “foster home” is defined as “a
household in which an orphaned, neglected, or delinquent child is placed for
care.” What is “orphaned” defined
as? It’s defined as a child whose
parents are deceased. What is
“neglected” defined as? It’s defined as
suffering or lack of proper care. And
last but not least, what is “delinquent” defined as? It’s defined as a young person showing a
tendency to commit crime. (Webster). As
you can see from these definitions, foster care deals with three specific
categories of children. This paper is
going to focus on one particular category: those children who have been
neglected.
In an anonymous story shared online, a young girl tells of
her experience through the foster care system.
Starting at the age of two years old, she was placed in 27 foster homes,
but was returned to her biological parents three times before their parental
rights were permanently severed. (Anonymous). Why should a child have to go
through all the stress and trauma of abuse in their biological home, and be
forced to move to dozens of foster homes while still so young? I believe that there should be higher
standards and more accountability for biological parents whose children have
been placed in foster care. Not only
should the parents be held accountable, but there should be more support and
help from organizations for the biological parents who are entrusted with their
children again. By having these
standards and greater support, maybe we can stop the pattern of the revolving
door for children going in and out of foster care. It’s a chain that needs to be broken.
The concept of foster care was started in 1853 by a
gentleman named Charles Loring Brace, who founded the Children’s Aid Society.
(National Foster Parent Association).
Brace believed there was a way to change the future for the 30,000
children living in the slums of New York City, so he transported them by train
to farm families in the South and out West. (Children’s Aid Society). In the 1990’s, an approach known as concurrent
planning was initiated by Children’s Aid.
The concept behind concurrent planning was to “eliminate delays in
attaining permanent families for children and youth in foster care.” (Child
Welfare Information Gateway). This helps to work towards a child’s primary
permanency goal such as reunification with their birth family, or a secondary
goal such as a guardianship with a relative.
Until this primary or secondary goal is achieved, the child is placed
into foster care.
The process of becoming a licensed foster home is a lengthy
one that can take three to six months.
This process consists of detailed background checks for all adults in
the household, receiving references on why the family would be substantial to
provide foster care, details about the home and neighborhood, etcetera; yet,
when biological parents go through the steps to get their children back into
their custody, their accountability standards are much lower. Yes, biological parents meet high
requirements to be privileged the ultimate goal of reunification, and some
requirement are as follows: successfully pass random drug tests, uphold stable
housing, maintain proper and legal employment, take assessments, and attend any
kind of training or classes required. Once
the parents meet all the required standards for their specific case plan, they
are reunited. After reunification is
when things can go south again.
Why? It’s due to the fact that
there is no way to support and help monitor the families once their case is
closed. When the parents can’t provide
and care for the children, the kids are put back into the foster care
system. How is this healthy for the
children? It’s not. Hence the short story that I talked about in
the beginning of this paper: how many times do children have to go through the
revolving door of being placed in and being taken out of this system before the
court says they’ve gone through enough?
Why aren’t biological parents – to earn their parental
rights – required to be monitored just as foster families are? I understand that some people might view this
as a violation of an individual’s right to parent their own children, but if an
individual is putting their children in harm’s way, then I believe there should
be some form of regulation. What kind of
regulation? A simple checks and balances
system. I believe that the court should
do random home visits to check on the health and living conditions of the
children. Foster parents are required to
succumb to these mandated visits, so why can’t parents – those who neglected
their children in the first place – be required to have random, monthly visits
as well?
Some
people might view this regulation as a form of unnecessary governmental
spending; but why not put money towards a healthy future for kids, instead of
setting them up for failure? By not
giving these biological parents a stricter set of guidelines to earning rights
to their children back, when the kids are returned there’s no one there to help
the parents give their children what is in the best interest for them. This is also when the foster care system
should be taken one step further. When
the kids go back to their biological families, why aren’t organizations set up
to help the parents realize what they need to provide for their children all
day every day?
According
to futureofchildren.org, “a significant number of children reenter care within
10 years of being reunified.” (Wulczyn, 105). Looking more
specifically: of the children who reenter care, almost 70% reenter within a
year, and 57% returned within 3 months.
More precisely, 40% of children who return to foster care do so within
90 days. (Wulczyn, 106). Patterns show
that children who are reunified typically leave foster care relatively quickly;
however, after the first year of a child being in care, the likelihood of
reunification is significantly smaller (Wulczyn, 106). Why?
Is the likelihood of reunification smaller after the first year of care
because the parents lose motivation? Is
it because the parents don’t work towards the ultimate goal of having their
children being reunified with them?
Whatever the reason, more needs to be done about it. One challenge is this: parents have a sense
of ‘freedom’ when their children are taken away from them; and as
heart-breaking as it is, a large majority of these parents don’t have a strong
motivation to get their children back into their care. When the parents lack motivation, they don’t
meet certain criteria on their case plans – causing the kids to suffer through
the instability of not having a ‘home’ since their parents don’t seem to care,
and the parents can even skip weekly visits with their children – this causes
the kids to go through a roller coaster of emotional distress. None of that is healthy for the
children!
I
strongly believe that there should be higher standards for biological parents
to achieve, as well as biological parent accountability if these families truly
want to get their kids back into their own care. I also strongly believe that there should be
organizations available to these parents to help minimize the percentage of
children who reenter the foster care system.
Every little bit helps. Every
child matters. Every emotion should be
carefully considered.
WORKS
CITED
Anonymous.
“I Was in Foster Care as a Child.” Experience
Project. May 30. Web.
October 18, 2013. www.experienceproject.com/stories/Was-In-Foster-Care-As-A-Child/3212118
Child
Safety in Foster Care Planning Council for Health and Services. “Best and Evidence-Based Practices that Enhance Safety of Children in Foster Care.” PDF article. May 2009.
Pages 1-23. Web. October 18, 2013. www.planningcouncil.org/PDF/Best.Practices.pdf
Child
Welfare Information Gateway. “Concurrent Planning.” Child Welfare
Information Gateway. 2012. Web. October
18, 2013. https://www.childwelfare.gov/permanency/overview/concurrent.cfm
Craft,
Carrie. “What Are the Steps to Family Reunification within the Foster Care System?” About.com. 2013. Web. October 18, 2013. http://adoption.about.com/od/working-with-birth-parents/a/What-Are-The-Steps-To-Family-Reunification-Within-The-Foster-Care-Systyem.htm
“Foster
Care History & Accomplishments”. Childrensaidsociety.org.Web. November
24,2013. www.childrensaidsociety.org/adoption-foster-care/foster-care-history-accomplishments
“History
of Foster Care in the United States.” National Foster Parent
Association. Web. November 24, 2013. www.nfpaonline.org/blank.htm
Wulczyn,
Fred. “Family Reunification.” Future of
Children. 95-114. Web. December 2, 2013. www.futureofchildren.org
~Good Intentions~
I always have good intentions when it comes to blogging, and these good intentions usually last about three days, then life takes over again and blogging is no longer on my mind. With this blog, I hope - HOPE - to blog fairly frequently.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)